Thread:Koschei/@comment-11628118-20130711143900/@comment-11628118-20130711162335

There are several OGL issues to consider. First, the OGL requires a clear designation of what material is OGC versus what is PI. Second, you cannot indicate compatibility or reference other PI without a separate license from the PI holder. Third, every OGL product needs a proper copyright declaration ("Section 15.") Four, Wikia pages are naturally CC licensed, which would lead to a dual licensure system, and the OGL does not automatically translate into CC-compliant. The resulting work would be under both licenses.

The PI declarations may be sufficient, but it's something that is hard to track on a wiki. The website does not have, AFAIK, a Powered by Fantasy Craft license, so PI terms would be proscribed and in fact any claim of compatibility with FC would be disallowed. The fact that that OGL was copied from the FCDB is actually kind of disturbing as it does not have a proper Section 15 declaration. Lastly, the OGL requires you to to warrant you have the authority to contribute, as does the CC, and in many cases, OGL texts would not be eligible for licensure under a CC license.